ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026
Working memory's pointer system is governed by physical objecthood, not spatiotemporal information.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To properly reflect the dynamic environment, the online representations in visual working memory (VWM) must be constantly accessed and modified when the corresponding items change. Such updating depends on a continuous mapping between each VWM representation and a subset of the external environment, instantiated by a "pointer system." If this mapping is disrupted, the representations cannot be updated, and instead VWM removes the unmapped representations and starts anew. During this "resetting" process, people are blind to salient changes in the items whose representations are inaccessible, creating a behavioral cost. The goal of this study was to test whether VWM's pointers are governed by spatiotemporal information or objecthood. In two preregistered studies, participants performed an "online change detection" task, reporting visible changes in items' shapes, which happened during their (task-irrelevant) movement. Experiment 1 showed that when an intact object abruptly changes its spatiotemporal trajectory, the mapping is sustained, with no resetting cost. Experiment 2 showed that when only half the object changes its trajectory, which effectively splits the object in two, the mapping no longer survives, with diminished performance indicating a resetting process. Critically, a behavioral cost was found even for the half that continued in the same spatiotemporal trajectory, pinpointing objecthood as the driving factor. Together, the results demonstrate that resetting does not reflect mere pointer reassignment, but a specific invalidation of the mapping between representations and the environment. In sustaining this mapping, VWM's pointer system relies not on spatiotemporal information per se, but on physical objecthood.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.