ArticleSpine deformity2026
Accuracy of vertebral rotation assessment using biplanar imaging technology in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.
Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study is to determine the accuracy of biplanar radiography in calculating vertebral axial rotation in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
methodsA single-center retrospective review of patients with AIS who received a preoperative CT and biplanar imaging (EOS imaging, Paris, France) was performed. Axial rotation of each vertebra was assessed by EOS and by true axial CT images. The relative vertebral rotation difference (VRD) of each vertebra in relation to the apex was calculated to standardize the reference plane. Paired testing and correlations were used to compare the VRD between the two imaging modalities.
results32 patients were reviewed. The average major curve cobb was 66° ± 10°. There was no significant difference between modalities on paired analysis except at T3, T4, T5, and T6 (p = 0.03; p = 0.01; p = 0.02; p = 0.01). Despite these differences, there were moderate to strong correlations between both modalities at every level.
conclusionDespite minor differences in VRD in the proximal thoracic spine, our findings suggest that axial rotation measured by EOS is an accurate representation of rotational deformity in the uninstrumented AIS spine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998315What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.