Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998168›Full record

ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026

Single-Stage Total Alar Reconstruction Using an Integrated Lining Nasolabial Flap.

Bilgen Can, Tahir Aziz Eser

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Bilgen CanDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Balıkesir University, Altıeylül, Balıkesir, 10100, Turkey.
Tahir Aziz EserDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Balıkesir University, Altıeylül, Balıkesir, 10100, Turkey. aziz.eser@icloud.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-7552-5540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTotal alar reconstruction is challenging because it requires recreating a unique, multilayered anatomy with dynamic characteristics. Conventional techniques are often multistage and require additional donor sites for internal lining and cartilage grafting, thereby increasing donor-site morbidity. Secondary thinning procedures are often required, and long-term alar stability outcomes remain variable. We present the Integrated Lining Nasolabial Flap, a single-stage technique in which the internal lining is derived from dermal and epidermal layers of the flap itself, thereby eliminating additional donor-site morbidity. We report functional and aesthetic outcomes and assess postoperative alar stability, focusing on the potential role of sustained nasal dilator use as a non-cartilage-based supportive strategy. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwenty patients who underwent single-stage total alar reconstruction with the Integrated Lining Nasolabial Flap were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with at least 6 months of follow-up were included in the analysis. Early and late postoperative complications were recorded. Postoperative alar collapse was assessed and analyzed in relation to nasal dilator compliance. Cosmetic outcomes were evaluated using a visual analog scale and the FACE-Q "Satisfaction with Nostrils" module, and the association with patient age was examined.

resultsTwenty patients (mean age, 60.2 ± 7.9 years) underwent single-stage reconstruction with this technique and were included in the analysis, with a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 6-32 months). Early complications occurred in 2 patients (10%) and were limited to superficial wound dehiscence, which was managed conservatively. No flap loss, vascular compromise, or internal lining necrosis was observed. Late complications were observed in 8 patients (40%), including alar retraction in 2 (10%), isolated alar collapse in 1 (5%), combined alar collapse with retraction in 2 (10%), and alar asymmetry in 3 (15%). No patient required a secondary thinning procedure. Alar collapse (isolated or combined) occurred in three patients (15%), all of whom were noncompliant with nasal dilator use; no collapse was observed among compliant patients (P = 0.004). The median cosmetic VAS score was 60 (range, 50-90), and the median FACE-Q "Satisfaction with Nostrils" score was 72 (range, 44-91). No significant correlation was found between age and aesthetic outcomes.

conclusionThe Integrated Lining Nasolabial Flap allows single-stage total alar reconstruction by creating the internal lining from the flap itself, avoiding additional donor sites and secondary thinning procedures. In this Level IV study, sustained postoperative nasal dilator use was significantly associated with improved alar stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: This technique offers a single-stage solution for total alar reconstruction by integrating the internal lining into the nasolabial flap design, potentially reducing surgical complexity and donor-site morbidity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors   www.springer.com/00266 .

Indexed as

Nose NeoplasmsRhinoplastySurgical FlapsAgedCohort StudiesEstheticsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNasal CartilagesPatient SatisfactionRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentTreatment OutcomeAlar stabilityMechanical stress–mediated tissue remodelingNasal dilatorNasal dilator complianceNon-cartilaginous alar repairSingle-stage alar reconstruction

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.