ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Clinical Implications of Pitanguy Ligament Management for Nasal Tip Contouring in Open versus Closed Rhinoplasty.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeveral modalities have been developed to achieve precise tip contouring and address postsurgical edema. This comparative study aimed to analyze the short- and long-term effects of the Pitanguy ligament management on nasal tip aesthetics and postsurgical edema in open versus closed rhinoplasty.
methodsPatients were divided into three groups, each comprising 40 individuals. Group I (open rhinoplasty without ligament repair), Group II (open rhinoplasty with ligament repair), and Group III (closed rhinoplasty with ligament preservation). All patients included in the study were evaluated for the depth of the supratip area, nasal tip edema, rotations, projections and completed the Rhinoplasty Outcome Evaluation questionnaire.
resultsThe depth of the supratip area and tip edema were significantly different in group I than in groups II and III in early postoperative follow-ups (p<0.001). The Goode score and nasolabial angle were significantly different between groups I and III in the early postoperative period (p<0.05). However, there were no statistically significant differences in the depth of the supratip area, tip edema, and Goode score at 12 months postoperatively among the groups.
conclusionsPrecise control of the cartilaginous framework and soft-tissue covering combines the concepts that provide control of the projection, position, and rotation of the nasal tip in the long-term. Although subsiding initial edema and improved supratip definition were achieved in the early postoperative follow-up, there were no differences between the results of the surgeries in all groups in the long-term. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41998167What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.