ArticleScientific reports2026
Deficit-irrigation management for sustainable grape production (Vitis vinifera L.): different regimes to assess yield and berry quality under arid conditions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Water scarcity is one of the main obstacles to agricultural development, particularly in Egypt. Grapevines are sensitive to drought and therefore depend heavily on improved irrigation regimes. It could be a crucial approach for the agricultural development of any country. This study evaluated the effect of deficit irrigation regimes on the growth, productivity, and cluster quality of the Flame seedless grapevines during two successive seasons (2024 and 2025) at a private orchard in the Luxor Governorate, Egypt. Grapevines were distributed in a completely randomized block design (CRBD) with three irrigation treatments and three replicates of each: (T1)—100% of crop water requirements (CWR), serving as the control; (T2)—80% of CWR; and (T3)—60% of CWR. The results indicated that vines receiving 80% CWR had a yield decrease of 3.70% compared to full irrigation; however, the amount of water saved throughout this process compensated for the lower yield, thus it did not have a significant overall impact. The irrigation treatment had an impact on all of the cluster’s assessed physicochemical characteristics, with irrigation at 80% CWR being the best strategy for reducing water consumption and enhancing cluster quality. By balancing resource conservation, productivity, and quality, 80% CWR represents a viable solution to meet the dual challenges of sustainable agriculture and water scarcity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.