ArticleScientific reports2026
Intelligent scheduling and resource allocation for urban air mobility networks based on graph neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) represents a promising solution to metropolitan transportation challenges, yet efficient scheduling and resource allocation in large-scale UAM networks remain computationally intractable for traditional optimization methods. This paper proposes a hybrid scheduling framework that couples graph neural network prediction with deterministic constraint repair for UAM scheduling and resource allocation. We first develop a heterogeneous graph representation scheme that captures diverse network elements including vertiports, waypoints, and aircraft with their distinct attributes. A spatiotemporal graph attention network (ST-GAT) architecture is then constructed, integrating spatial topology awareness with temporal dynamics modeling through dual attention channels. Furthermore, an adaptive multi-objective optimization strategy is designed to balance throughput maximization, delay minimization, and energy efficiency while satisfying operational constraints. Experimental results on a simulated metropolitan UAM network demonstrate that the proposed method achieves 94.2% throughput under peak demand conditions with average delay of 4.1 min, outperforming genetic algorithm and simulated annealing baselines by 15.9% and 19.9% respectively. The integrated pipeline—comprising neural scheduling prediction and post-processing feasibility repair—maintains sub-second inference latency up to 250 concurrent aircraft and 60 vertiports, confirming its suitability for real-time operational deployment within the tested scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.