Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998132›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Robust observer-sliding mode composite control for mechanical systems under uncertain disturbances.

Qin Li, Yuexiang Hu, Xinxiang Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Qin Li *Hunan Mechanical & Electrical Polytechnic, Hunan, Changsha, 410117, China.
Yuexiang Hu *Hunan Mechanical & Electrical Polytechnic, Hunan, Changsha, 410117, China.
Xinxiang Fang *Hunan Mechanical & Electrical Polytechnic, Hunan, Changsha, 410117, China. fang1976edu@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper investigates a composite control strategy combining an extended state observer (ESO) with sliding mode control (SMC) for mechanical systems subject to unknown disturbances and unmeasured velocity states. The main contribution is the development of an improved ESO with a time-varying gain mechanism that addresses the peaking phenomenon commonly associated with conventional high-gain observers while maintaining fast convergence. This time-varying gain is designed to start from a conservative value and smoothly transition to a high-gain regime, providing a quantitative trade-off between transient peaking and asymptotic accuracy. Based on the accurate disturbance estimates and reconstructed states from the proposed observer, a sliding mode controller is synthesized with active disturbance compensation, which significantly reduces chattering-a long-standing issue in conventional SMC. The second contribution lies in the theoretical analysis: using Lyapunov theory, we rigorously prove the uniform ultimate boundedness of all closed-loop signals and explicitly characterize how the observer and controller parameters influence the steady-state error bound. Unlike existing ESO-based methods that focus solely on observer structure optimization, the proposed framework integrates state estimation and robust control in a unified composite architecture with provable stability guarantees. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior tracking accuracy and disturbance rejection compared to conventional PID and SMC without ESO, confirming its effectiveness under severe interference.

Indexed as

Disturbance rejectionExtended state observerLyapunov stabilityMechanical systemsRobust controlSliding mode control

Identifiers

PMID41998132
PMCPMC13226719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.