Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998122›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Translating predictive models into clinical practice: fast-and-frugal trees for postoperative delirium using routine data.

Odette Wegwarth, Felix Balzer, Sebastian D Boie, Niklas Giesa, Anika Müller, Jan K Woike, Claudia Spies, Helge Giese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Odette WegwarthDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CCM | CVK, Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy & Evidence-Based Decisions, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany. odette.wegwarth@charite.de.
Felix BalzerInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Sebastian D BoieInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Niklas GiesaInstitute of Medical Informatics, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anika MüllerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CCM | CVK, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Jan K WoikeCenter for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.
Claudia SpiesDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CCM | CVK, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Helge GieseDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine | CCM | CVK, Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy & Evidence-Based Decisions, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 10117, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and serious complication associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Although predictive models for POD exist, they are rarely implemented in routine clinical practice, partly due to their complexity and data requirements. Simple and interpretable tools based on routinely available data may improve clinical applicability. In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated Fast-and-Frugal Trees (FFTrees) for predicting POD using routine electronic health record data from 61,150 surgical patients treated between 2017 and 2020 at a large German university hospital. We assessed the transferability of previously developed FFTrees and compared their performance with logistic regression, classification and regression trees, random forests, and support vector machines. Updated FFTrees were derived for pre- and peri-operative prediction. Previously published FFTrees showed reduced performance in routine data but improved after recalibration. Updated FFTrees achieved balanced accuracies of 58% (pre-operative) and 60% (peri-operative), with performance comparable to more complex models. Although predictive accuracy was moderate across all models, FFTrees offer advantages in simplicity, transparency, and ease of implementation. As easily memorized decision rules, they can help clinicians organize familiar cues in an optimal order, supporting delirium risk assessment in routine practice where more complex tools are rarely used.

Indexed as

DeliriumPostoperative ComplicationsAgedClassification AlgorithmsElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMalePrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID41998122
PMCPMC13091790

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.