ArticleScientific reports2026
Universal approach to actigraphic sleep/wake scoring, verified against 5 classic algorithms on 3 datasets.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Actigraphy is a non-invasive and inexpensive method to monitor sleep/wake patterns in a natural environment via a wrist-worn activity sensor. Traditionally, detection of sleep/wake periods from actigraphic data relies on smoothing and thresholding the time series of recorded "activity counts". The first step is implemented by convolution with empirically chosen coefficients, tailored separately for the data and hardware used in each study. We propose to implement this step via a universal low-pass filter, applicable to wide ranges of recording hardware and sampling rates. For verification of this approach, we used 1635 overnight coregistrations of actigraphic and polysomnographic (PSG) data from three different datasets, including one dataset recorded for this study. Optimizations of the filter for concordance of sleep/wake scoring with PSG for different subsets of these data converged to similar parameters, which we tentatively treat as fluctuations around the characteristics of a universal filter. We assess the performance of the proposed approach and five classic algorithms (Cole-Kripke, Sazonov, Scripps, UCSD and Webster) in the same cross-validation scheme. Concordance with PSG, achieved using the universal filter, is significantly higher (at [Formula: see text]) than any of the classical algorithms for the most relevant metrics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.