Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998077›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Grey water footprint of pharmaceuticals and personal care products discharged via urban wastewater.

Lada Stejskalová, Libor Ansorge, Pavel Rosendorf, Daniel Fiala, Yelizaveta Chernysh, Angeles Blanco, Laetitia Minguez, Jiří Kučera, Anna Břicháčková, Dagmar Vološinová and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lada Stejskalovápublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic. lada.stejskalova@vuv.cz.
Libor Ansorgepublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Pavel Rosendorfpublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Daniel Fialapublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Yelizaveta ChernyshInternational Innovation and Applied Center "Aquatic Artery", Sumy State University, Kharkivska st. 116, Sumy, 40007, Ukraine.
Angeles BlancoComplutense University of Madrid, 28015, Madrid, Spain.
Laetitia MinguezUniversity of Lorraine, CNRS, LIEC, 57000, Metz, France.
Jiří Kučerapublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Anna Břicháčkovápublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Dagmar Vološinovápublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Lenka Smetanovápublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.
Miroslav Váňapublic research institution, T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute, Podbabská 2582/30, 16000, Prague, Czech Republic.

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2022-136816OB-I00Ministry of the Interior of the Czech Republic VI20172020097Technology Agency of the Czech Republic SS02030027T. G. Masaryk Water Research Institute 3600.24/2025
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urban wastewater is a significant source of micro- and macropollutants in aquatic ecosystems, posing a high potential risk to drinking water sources. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) are widely recognized as contaminants of emerging concern, although their relative burden compared to traditional pollutants remains insufficiently quantified. This study presents a comprehensive assessment of 92 micropollutants together with conventional pollution represented by nutrients and organic pollutants across 19 municipalities in the catchment of the largest Czech drinking water reservoir. More than one hundred 24-hour composite measurements were analysed. The Grey Water Footprint methodology integrates ecotoxicological thresholds, enabling a consistent comparison across PPCPs, nutrients, and organic pollution. Results reveal that the most critical micropollutants released from centralized wastewater treatment plants are Ibuprofen or Diclofenac, depending on treatment technology and plant size. However, nitrogen remains the dominant stressor approximately one kilometer downstream of urban discharges. These findings highlight that despite the increasing attention to micropollutants, conventional pollutants still account for the largest share of pollution in recipients. The methodological framework applied in this study allows stakeholders to compare the risks of different types of pollutants in a specific region. It offers a transferable tool for prioritizing contaminants and treatments, and guiding local wastewater management strategies under the EU Water Framework Directive, risk assessments under the revised Urban Wastewater Treatment Directive, and beyond.

Indexed as

WastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalCitiesCzech RepublicEnvironmental MonitoringPersonal Care ProductsPharmaceutical PreparationsWaste Disposal, FluidPersonal Care ProductsPharmaceutical PreparationsWastewaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalGrey water footprintMicropollutantsPollutant priorizationPPCPUrban wastewaterWater pollution

Identifiers

PMID41998077
PMCPMC13249973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.