Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998065›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Machine learning and adaptive control for optimizing MSW-algal biomass anaerobic co-digestion.

Monika D Tiwari, Sagar W Dhengare, Ganesh K Yenurkar, Rajesh M Bhagat, Prashant B Pande, Anjana S

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monika D TiwariDepartment of Civil Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, 441110, Maharashtra, India. tiwarimonika634@gmail.com.
Sagar W DhengareDepartment of Civil Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, 441110, Maharashtra, India.
Ganesh K YenurkarDepartment of Computer Technology, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, 441110, Maharashtra, India. ganeshyenurkar@gmail.com.
Rajesh M BhagatDepartment of Civil Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, 441110, Maharashtra, India.
Prashant B PandeDepartment of Civil Engineering, Yeshwantrao Chavan College of Engineering, Nagpur, 441110, Maharashtra, India.
Anjana SDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Udupi, 576104, Karnataka, India. anjana.s@manipal.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Municipal solid waste (MSW)- algal biomass anaerobic co-digestion (AcoD) generates renewable energy and sustainable waste management. However, conventional AcoD systems achieve suboptimal methane yields (typically < 250 L CH₄/kg VS) due to substrate incompatibility, process instability, and lack of real-time control. We developed an integrated framework combining machine learning prediction, stoichiometric-metabolic modeling, and sensor-based adaptive control to optimize lipid-rich algal biomass co-digestion with MSW. A Substrate Synergy Estimation Model (SSEM) employs random forest regression trained on 76 co-digestion scenarios to predict optimal MSW: algae ratios for maximum methane yield. The predicted optimal ratio serves as input to a Dynamic Stoichiometric-Metabolic Coupled Reactor Model (DS-MCRM) that simulates real-time substrate degradation and methane production pathways. A sensor network with adaptive PID control achieved 64% CH₄ purity (vs. 40% in uncontrolled reactors) and reduced VFA accumulation by 53% through zone-specific process adjustments. Isotopic tracing with ¹³C-labeled palmitic acid quantified lipid-to-methane conversion efficiency at 88.6 ± 2.3%, confirming the contribution of algal lipids to overall methane production. Lifecycle assessment using the Waste Stream Circularity Index (WSCI) yielded a score of 0.83, indicating 72% nitrogen recovery, 68% phosphorus recovery, and 76% carbon loop closure. Compared to conventional co-digestion approaches, our integrated framework achieved 2.1× higher methane yield prediction accuracy (R² = 0.91), faster VFA stabilization (day 6 vs. day 12), and superior resource recovery, demonstrating potential for data-driven optimization of waste-to-energy systems.

Indexed as

BiomassMachine LearningRefuse DisposalSolid WasteAnaerobiosisBioreactorsMethanePredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestMethaneSolid WasteAlgal BiomassAnaerobic Co-DigestionCircular EconomyMachine LearningMethane OptimizationMunicipal Solid WasteProcess Control

Identifiers

PMID41998065
PMCPMC13249887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.