Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998054›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Valorization of coal gangue as a sustainable supplementary cementitious material for immersed tube tunnel construction: equivalent strength performance in LC

Haibin Li, Hua Liu, Lingchen Kong, Xiaohui Liu, Zhennan Wang, Yongshun Zhang, Junfei Zhang, Ling Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Haibin LiCCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Design & Consulting Company Ltd., Tianjin, 300461, China.
Hua LiuCCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Design & Consulting Company Ltd., Tianjin, 300461, China.
Lingchen KongCCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Design & Consulting Company Ltd., Tianjin, 300461, China.
Xiaohui LiuCCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Design & Consulting Company Ltd., Tianjin, 300461, China.
Zhennan WangCCCC First Harbor Engineering Company Ltd., CCCC Tianjin Port Engineering Design & Consulting Company Ltd., Tianjin, 300461, China.
Yongshun ZhangSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China.
Junfei ZhangSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China. junfeizhang@hebut.edu.cn.
Ling WangSchool of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin, 300401, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cement industry is a major source of global CO₂ emissions, and limestone calcined clay cement (LC³) is a promising low-carbon alternative, but its large-scale application is limited by the dependence on high-cost commercial calcined clays. Coal gangue (CG) is a massive industrial solid waste with potential pozzolanic activity after thermal activation, yet its reaction behavior, synergistic mechanisms, and performance equivalence to commercial calcined clays in LC³ systems remain unclear, with a lack of quantitative assessment of its carbon emission reduction potential. To address these gaps, this study conducts a multi-scale investigation on thermally activated coal gangue (CCG)-based LC³ cement, combining experimental characterization including X-ray diffraction, thermogravimetric analysis, scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, isothermal calorimetry and life cycle assessment. The results show that the optimal mass ratio of CCG to limestone is 2:1, and the LC³ formulation with 20% CCG replacement achieves a 28-day compressive strength comparable to that of commercial calcined clay-based LC³ and ordinary Portland cement. A synergistic reaction mechanism involving sulfate, carbonate, and aluminosilicate is clarified: gypsum regulates early aluminate hydration, while limestone reacts with reactive aluminates derived from CCG to form stable carboaluminate phases, which refine the pore structure and densifying the microstructure. LCA results indicate that the optimal CCG-based LC³ formulation reduces the global warming potential by 24.4% compared to ordinary Portland cement. This study realizes the high-value utilization of CG and provides a low-cost, sustainable alternative to commercial calcined clays for LC³ technology, offering technical support for the decarbonization of the cement industry and the disposal of industrial solid waste.

Identifiers

PMID41998054
PMCPMC13250163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.