ArticleScientific reports2026
Metaproteomics uncovers the functional capacity of a soil microbiome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The soil microbiome plays a vital role in key ecosystem processes, but its functional capacity remains poorly understood. Microbial activities underpin many applications in environmental biotechnology, such as nutrient cycling, contaminant degradation, and the recovery and transformation of minerals and elements. However, analyzing the complex soil metaproteome is challenging. Here, we propose an approach to explore soil metaproteomes, which will improve our understanding of the metabolic potential within the soil microbiome. As a proof of concept, we generated high-quality metaproteomes from native prairie soil using high-resolution tandem mass spectrometry. Over 15,000 peptides were identified using paired metagenomes. By using lowest common ancestor method, the peptides were conservatively assigned to 21 bacterial, fungal, and archaeal phyla or superphyla, including rare soil bacterial phyla such as Candidatus Tectomicrobia, as well as viruses. Functional analysis at the pathway level was performed using complementary KEGG and MetaCyc databases, revealing essential biogeochemical cycles, such as carbon and sulfur cycling. By combining taxonomic and functional analyses, we disentangled the relative contributions of individual soil microbial phylum-level taxon to community metabolic functions. This study highlights the importance of taxon-resolved functional analysis enabled by soil metaproteomics, surpassing the capabilities of other single-omics methods. It offers new insights into how individual microbes function within complex soil microbiomes, paving the way for more targeted microbial strategies to improve system performance in bioeconomy applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.