ArticleScientific reports2026
Machine learning models for smart grid stability prediction: a comparative analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As renewable energy sources and variable demand increase, maintaining the stability of smart grids (SGs) helps guarantee that electricity systems continue to operate effectively and uninterrupted. More intelligent solutions are required since traditional monitoring methods frequently examine the initial indications of instability. This study proposes a machine learning (ML) methodology for classification and prediction of SG stability to obtain effectiveness in system operations and increase reliability. Fourteen ML models are used in this study for classification and prediction tasks. These ML models are tested under eight evaluation metrics. This study uses the features of engineering and selection to improve the model's performance and accuracy and reduce the dimensionality. Different feature selection methods are used, such as filter, wrapper, and embedded methods. We used two hyperparameter optimization methods, such as Bayesian optimization (tree-structured Parzen estimator, TPE) and metaheuristic optimization (grey wolf optimizer, GWO), to improve ML performance. The results show that light gradient boosting machine achieves near-perfect predictive performance under both optimization strategies, with the TPE-based model reaching 99.95% accuracy and the GWO-based model reaching 99.90%. We use different explainable AI methods to ensure the model is trustworthy. This study improves SG resilience and supports energy efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.