Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41998027›Full record

ArticleNPJ science of food2026

Trends, challenges, and opportunities for the United States alternative meat and seafood sector: stakeholder-informed perspectives.

Amanda Wood, Katherine Consavage Stanley, Jack Daly, Khara Grieger, William R Aimutis, Rohan A Shirwaiker, Norbert L W Wilson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ science of food, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amanda Wood *Department of Energy and Technology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden. amanda.wood@slu.se.
Katherine Consavage Stanley *Bezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Jack DalyBezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Khara GriegerBezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
William R AimutisBezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Rohan A ShirwaikerBezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Norbert L W WilsonBezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.

Funding

Bezos Earth Fund Bezos Center for Sustainable Protein at North Carolina State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Growing global protein demand has fueled innovation and investment in alternative protein (AP) products, including plant-based, fermentation-derived, and cell-cultivated products. Through interviews with AP stakeholders in the United States (U.S.), we explored the sector's evolution, challenges, opportunities, and trends. Interviewees described a boom from 2009 to 2021 followed by a decline, which the sector is now working to reverse. Achieving taste and price parity, attracting a broad consumer base, producing at scale, and navigating a charged policy environment remain key sector challenges. Looking forward, stakeholders were optimistic, noting opportunities including collaborations within and across sectors; workforce development; innovative financing, scalability models, and products; and increased policy engagement. Findings indicate that the U.S. AP sector is at a critical inflection point. This study points to future research, financing, and innovation that could help AP products become a mainstay in the food system.

Identifiers

PMID41998027
PMCPMC13090389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.