ArticleScientific reports2026
Predicting unconfined compressive strength of geopolymer-stabilized clays using a sector fruit fly-based extreme learning machine.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate prediction of the unconfined compressive strength (UCS) of geopolymer-stabilized clayey soil is critical for geotechnical engineering. Conventional regression algorithms and even advanced machine learning approaches such as artificial neural networks often struggle to fully capture the highly non-linear interactions among soil properties and geopolymer mix parameters while maintaining computational efficiency and interpretability on limited datasets. To address these challenges, this investigation proposes a novel hybrid predictive framework based on a sector fruit fly optimization algorithm–enhanced extreme learning machine (SFOA-ELM) for improved UCS estimation. The model used 270 experimental records with 8 input variables (i.e., liquid limit, plasticity index, GGBS content, molarity). The baseline ELM achieved moderate performance (training R² = 0.9432, testing R² = 0.9054; RMSE = 1.55 MPa and 1.91 MPa, respectively). The predictive accuracy of the standard FOA-ELM improved to an R² of 0.9768 (training) and 0.9318 (testing), with RMSE values of 0.99 MPa (training) and 1.62 MPa (testing). The performance of the SFOA-ELM model improved to have excellent predictive performance with an R² value of 0.9775 (training) and 0.9446 (testing), and an RMSE value of 0.98 MPa (training) and 1.462 MPa (testing), respectively. The SFOA-ELM model reduced the testing MSE by 42% compared to ELM and by 19% compared to FOA-ELM. A SHAP analysis suggested that GGBS content, plasticity index and liquid limit were the most important for prediction. The statistical validations and residual analysis confirmed SFOA-ELM’s ability to generalize effectively and exhibit a tight distribution of errors. These findings show that the SFOA-ELM framework offers a robust, computationally efficient, and interpretable tool for geopolymer mix design and UCS prediction, providing practical decision-support for geotechnical engineering applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.