ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026
Comparison of T-DXd-associated pulmonary toxicity in real-world settings and clinical trials.
Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interstitial Lung Disease and Cardiotoxicity Associated with Trastuzumab Deruxtecan, Sacituzumab Govitecan, and Trastuzumab Emtansine: A Narrative Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Precision Therapeutics in Pancreatic Cancer: Emerging Targeted, Immune, and Antibody-Drug Conjugate Strategies Exemplified by Adagrasib, Dostarlimab, and Trastuzumab Deruxtecan.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Toxicities of Antibody-Drug Conjugates in Breast Cancer: From Mechanistic Insights to Clinical Management.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and potentially life-threatening adverse event associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). In the pivotal T-DXd clinical trials, 10-15% of patients developed ILD, with stringent mitigation strategies aimed at the early detection of low-grade cases. Real-world data are urgently needed to assess ILD incidence and outcomes outside controlled trial settings. This retrospective analysis included 190 patients treated with T-DXd at the Vienna Healthcare Group between August 2020 and December 2023. Among them, 17 (8.9%) developed any-grade ILD, with 8 cases (4.2% of the total cohort; 47.1% of ILD cases) classified as grade ≥3. The median time to ILD onset was 86 days, with a significantly shorter onset for high-grade compared to low-grade ILD (44.5 vs. 119 days, p = 0.01). A pooled real-world analysis (n = 1255, including patients from this study) demonstrated a higher incidence of high-grade ILD in real-world settings compared to phase III trials (2.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.014), despite no significant difference in overall ILD incidence (10.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.62). However, high-grade ILD rates in the real-world cohort were comparable to those reported in early phase I/II trials (2.9% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.41). These findings suggest a greater risk of high-grade ILD in real-world settings and underscore the need for rigorous patient selection, screening, and management strategies in clinical practice. Furthermore, the shorter onset of high-grade ILD suggests distinct pathophysiological mechanisms that warrant further investigation.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.