Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41997997›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026

Comparison of T-DXd-associated pulmonary toxicity in real-world settings and clinical trials.

Simon Udovica, Rupert Bartsch, Christian F Singer, Clemens Leitgeb, Maximilian Marhold, Christian Peters-Engl, Verena Sagaster, Maximilian Hochmair, Muna Ferner, Wolfgang Hilbe and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Simon UdovicaDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria. simon.udovica@gesundheitsverbund.at.
Rupert BartschDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian F SingerDepartment of Gynecology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens LeitgebDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian MarholdDepartment of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Christian Peters-EnglDepartment of Gynecology, Klinik Hietzing, Vienna, Austria.
Verena SagasterDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Favoriten, Vienna, Austria.
Maximilian HochmairDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Karl Landsteiner Institute of Lung Research and Pulmonary Oncology, Klinik Floridsdorf, Vienna, Austria.
Muna FernerDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Wolfgang HilbeDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.
Kathrin Strasser-WeipplDepartment of Medicine, Center for Oncology and Hematology, Klinik Ottakring, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common and potentially life-threatening adverse event associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). In the pivotal T-DXd clinical trials, 10-15% of patients developed ILD, with stringent mitigation strategies aimed at the early detection of low-grade cases. Real-world data are urgently needed to assess ILD incidence and outcomes outside controlled trial settings. This retrospective analysis included 190 patients treated with T-DXd at the Vienna Healthcare Group between August 2020 and December 2023. Among them, 17 (8.9%) developed any-grade ILD, with 8 cases (4.2% of the total cohort; 47.1% of ILD cases) classified as grade ≥3. The median time to ILD onset was 86 days, with a significantly shorter onset for high-grade compared to low-grade ILD (44.5 vs. 119 days, p = 0.01). A pooled real-world analysis (n = 1255, including patients from this study) demonstrated a higher incidence of high-grade ILD in real-world settings compared to phase III trials (2.9% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.014), despite no significant difference in overall ILD incidence (10.4% vs. 11.1%, p = 0.62). However, high-grade ILD rates in the real-world cohort were comparable to those reported in early phase I/II trials (2.9% vs. 3.5%, p = 0.41). These findings suggest a greater risk of high-grade ILD in real-world settings and underscore the need for rigorous patient selection, screening, and management strategies in clinical practice. Furthermore, the shorter onset of high-grade ILD suggests distinct pathophysiological mechanisms that warrant further investigation.

Identifiers

PMID41997997
PMCPMC13275805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.