ReviewNature communications2026
Challenges and prospects of 2D electronics for future monolithic complementary field-effect transistors.
Review in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comprehensive Review on Doping Strategies for Two-Dimensional Tungsten Diselenide.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With planar complementary metal-oxide-semiconductor (CMOS) scaling nearing its physical limits, the transistor roadmap is transitioning toward monolithic three-dimensional (M3D) integration through complementary field-effect transistors (CFETs). While silicon (Si)-CFETs demonstrate the viability of monolithic stacking, their scalability is constrained by high thermal budgets, dopant diffusion, and alignment complexity. Two-dimensional (2D) materials offer atomically thin semiconducting channels with strong electrostatics and low-temperature process compatibility, making them promising candidates for back-end-of-line (BEOL) compatible CFETs integration and potential future front-end-of-line (FEOL) replacement. This Perspective outlines the challenges and prospects for 2D CFETs, addressing 2D material synthesis, n-/p-type 2D channel engineering, low-resistance metal contact, reliable gate dielectric integration, FEOL/BEOL compatibility and interconnect co-design for M3D architectures. Furthermore, we compare the heat dissipation and energy consumption between Si-CFET and 2D-CFET with different stacking configurations, predicting the superior thermal and power-efficiency benefits of 2D channels. These insights position 2D CFETs as an attractive platform, offering a scalable and thermally efficient pathway toward the Ångström-era logic architecture.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.