ArticleScientific reports2026
Improving energy absorption capability of the hexagonal honeycomb and re-entrant structures using a combined hierarchical design.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hexagonal honeycombs and re-entrant lattices have been widely used in energy-absorption applications. The hexagonal honeycomb structure, known for its positive Poisson's ratio and high specific stiffness and strength, has long been considered an effective energy absorber. However, with the increasing use of auxetic structures, their efficiency in energy absorption applications is being explored. Auxetic lattices exhibit a negative Poisson's ratio, which significantly enhances their energy absorption capacity. In this study, a combined hierarchical lattice structure is proposed by integrating the advantageous features of both hexagonal honeycomb and re-entrant lattices. Using additive manufacturing, the proposed lattice was fabricated, and its energy absorption behavior was experimentally investigated through quasi-static compression testing. Furthermore, the repeatability of the experimental results was verified using the finite element method. This numerical framework was then employed to simulate the energy absorption behavior of the base honeycomb and re-entrant lattices. To judge the effectiveness of the lattice structures in energy absorption, four parameters, including peak force, initial stiffness, specific energy absorption, and crush force efficiency, were selected as evaluation criteria. Accordingly, it was depicted that the re-entrant lattice in axial compression cannot be considered as an efficient energy absorber because of a very high peak force and lower crush force efficiency in comparison with the new structures. In addition, the hierarchical design of the new lattice enhanced its deformation and failure modes, delaying wall collapse and improving structural integrity under compression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.