ArticleNature communications2026
Accelerating spiking neural networks with photonic reconfigurable devices.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spiking neural networks face hardware limitations as conventional architectures exhibit low array utilization, underperforming GPU-driven artificial neural networks in vision tasks. We present a programmable spiking neurocomputing architecture using CMOS-compatible photonic reconfigurable devices that unify synaptic/neuronal functions in single components. The optical isolation of photonic reconfigurable devices suppresses inter-cell crosstalk while enabling independent neuronal/synaptic programmability without operational redundancy. Programmable spiking neurocomputing architecture maximizes array utilization to enhance computational efficiency for spiking neural networks acceleration. Compared with conventional architectures, our architecture on spiking Visual Geometry Group networks demonstrates 1176× latency reduction and 239× energy savings in static recognition/classification and dynamic detection/tracking tasks, while maintaining equivalent recognition accuracy. This photonic-electronic integration establishes a scalable hardware framework that bridges the performance gap between spiking neural networks and state-of-the-art artificial neural networks, particularly for complex visual information processing applications requiring both efficiency and precision.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.