ArticleNature communications2026
Divergent neural representations of space and task between physical and virtual navigation in macaques.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virtual reality is frequently used to explore the neural mechanisms of primate spatial cognition because it offers realistic simulations and precise experimental control. However, there remains a critical but untested assumption that virtual reality-based findings apply to real-world scenarios. We examined neural activity in the hippocampus and orbitofrontal cortex while two male macaque monkeys performed a spatial memory task in visually matched virtual and real environments. Monkeys learned the task efficiently in both settings. Neurons in both regions showed richer allocentric spatial representations in the real compared to the virtual environment, with individual cells unpredictably adjusting their specific responses. Cross-condition analyses revealed orthogonal population representations of task phases across the two environments. These results highlight the importance of studying monkeys in real-world settings, where they can fully express their behaviors and interact freely with their surroundings, to uncover the true neural basis of primate spatial cognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.