ArticleAnnals of clinical and translational neurology2026
Safety and Tolerability of Givinostat: Evidence From Real-World and Clinical Practice.
Article in Annals of clinical and translational neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe aim of our study was to establish the prevalence of adverse events in a real-world setting in boys living with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) treated with givinostat as part of an Expanded Access Program (EAP) in Italy.
methodsThe cohort included 90 ambulant boys, with age when treatment started between 6 and 23 years (mean 10.1 years, SD: 3.2 years) and with a follow up between 6.0 and 14.6 months (mean 10.6 months; SD 2.6 months).
resultsPlatelets count decrease and triglyceride levels increase were the most common adverse events, followed by diarrhea. A dose reduction was needed in 38 of the 90 boys following thrombocytopenia (n = 34), diarrhea (n = 2), and hypertriglyceridemia (n = 4), with two of the boys presenting both thrombocytopenia and hypertriglyceridemia. Eleven of the 38 boys with initial dose reduction (10 with thrombocytopenia and 1 with hypertriglyceridemia) required an additional dose reduction for persistence of values outside the threshold, with one of them discontinuing treatment because of persistent hypertriglyceridemia even with the lowest dose.
interpretationOur results confirm the safety profile observed in the pivotal study providing further evidence of the management of the drug in a real-world setting. In our experience, treatment with givinostat was well managed by maintaining a strict monitoring. This was facilitated by allowing families to perform blood tests in local labs, reducing the stress and burden of frequent visits to the hospital.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.