ReviewSeminars in perinatology2026
Enteral nutrition in neonates: current evidence from clinical trials and evolving strategies.
Review in Seminars in perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enteral feeding practices and guideline adherence for very low birth weight infants in Chinese NICUs: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in neonatal intensive care and increased availability of randomized clinical trial data, optimal enteral nutrition strategies remain debated, with significant gaps between evidence and practice. We reviewed current evidence for enteral feeding in neonates. Recent clinical trials support the early progression of enteral feeding within 96 h of birth and faster advancement rates of 30-40 mL/kg/day in preterm infants. Evidence demonstrates that these strategies reduce the time to full feeds and decrease the risk of sepsis without increasing the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis. A recent multicenter trial confirmed that, when maternal milk supply is limited, donor human milk reduces necrotizing enterocolitis incidence compared to formula, however, without neurodevelopmental advantages. Multiple trials found no superiority of human milk-based over bovine-based fortifiers. Abandoning routine gastric residual assessment reduces time to full feeds without increasing complications, but a large confirmatory trial is underway. Evidence now supports low-volume feeding during therapeutic hypothermia for hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, with fed infants achieving full feeds earlier and having a shorter hospital stay. For congenital heart disease, hemodynamically stable infants can safely receive minimal human milk feeding pre and post-operatively within 5-7 days. Future trials need to focus on precision nutrition, optimal fortification strategies, and long-term effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.