ArticleJournal of epidemiology and community health2026
Health, poverty and employment effects of cutting income replacement benefits for the disabled: a difference-in-differences analysis of the 2017 welfare reforms.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and community health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth-related economic inactivity in England has risen, with more working-age adults claiming disability and incapacity benefits. The 2016 Welfare Reform and Work Act reduced weekly payments for Employment and Support Allowance recipients deemed capable of some work from April 2017, potentially affecting poverty, mental health and employment among people with long-term conditions (LTCs). Evidence on its causal impact is limited. DATA AND
methodsUsing UK Household Longitudinal Survey data (2010-2019), we evaluated the reform's impact on working-age individuals with LTCs. Triple-difference and difference-in-differences models assessed transitions in employment, poverty risk (income <40% median) and incident poor mental health (defined as SF-12 Mental Component Score ≤45.6 among those without prior poor mental health), controlling for age, gender, children and education.
resultsThe 2017 reform was associated with a 5.5 percentage point increase in poverty risk among individuals with LTCs leaving employment (95% CI 1.4% to 9.6%, p=0.008) and an 8.9 percentage point increase in the incidence of poor mental health in this group (95% CI 1.1% to 16.7%, p=0.025). No significant effects on transitions into or out of employment were observed at the 95% confidence level.Applying these estimates to national employment figures suggests that the reform may have resulted in approximately 37254 additional people entering severe poverty and 60117 additional cases of poor mental health annually.
conclusionsThese findings suggest that reductions in disability-related benefits may exacerbate financial and mental health vulnerability among affected individuals but not affect employment. This highlights the need for policy measures that balance fiscal objectives with social protection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.