ArticleScience advances2026
PATCH: A deep learning method to assess heterogeneity of artistic practice in historical paintings.
Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the Renaissance and Early Modern period, paintings were largely produced by master painters who directed workshops of apprentices and others who often contributed to the piece. Discerning who created these masterworks and how they did so is a central question in technical art history and a nontrivial problem that machine learning can help solve by extending analysis to a microscopic scale. Analysis of workshop paintings presents a challenge, however, because information about the members of workshops and the processes by which artworks were created remains elusive. Thus, external examples are not available to train networks to recognize. Here, we present a novel machine learning approach we call pairwise assignment training for classifying heterogeneity (PATCH) that is capable of identifying individual artistic practice regimes with no external training data. We apply this method to two historical paintings by the Spanish Renaissance master, El Greco, and our findings regarding one of the works potentially challenge previous studies that assert that a considerable portion of the painting was completed by workshop members after El Greco's death. PATCH outperforms statistical and unsupervised machine learning methods in this complex pairwise comparison problem lacking "ground truth" data, making it potentially useful across similar cases in the social and natural sciences, including image segmentation in remote sensing, urban development and design, and anomaly detection manufacturing contexts, among others.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.