Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996503›Full record

ArticleScience advances2026

PATCH: A deep learning method to assess heterogeneity of artistic practice in historical paintings.

Andrew Van Horn, Lauryn Smith, Mahamad Salah Mahmoud, Michael McMaster, Clara G Pinchbeck, Ina T Martin, Andrew Lininger, Anthony Ingrisano, Adam Lowe, Carlos Bayod and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andrew Van HornDepartment of Anthropology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5203-8049
Lauryn SmithDepartment of Art History and Art, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Mahamad Salah MahmoudDepartment of Computer and Data Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6032-4937
Michael McMasterDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Clara G PinchbeckDepartment of Art History and Art, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0009-0005-5169-6006
Ina T MartinDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9452-3299
Andrew LiningerDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6401-7301
Anthony IngrisanoPainting Department, Cleveland Institute of Art, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Adam LoweFactum Foundation, Madrid 28037, Spain.
Carlos BayodFactum Foundation, Madrid 28037, Spain.ORCID 0009-0002-0708-7367
Elizabeth S BolmanDepartment of Art History and Art, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2055-5828
Kenneth SingerDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9320-0148
Michael HinczewskiDepartment of Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2837-7697

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Renaissance and Early Modern period, paintings were largely produced by master painters who directed workshops of apprentices and others who often contributed to the piece. Discerning who created these masterworks and how they did so is a central question in technical art history and a nontrivial problem that machine learning can help solve by extending analysis to a microscopic scale. Analysis of workshop paintings presents a challenge, however, because information about the members of workshops and the processes by which artworks were created remains elusive. Thus, external examples are not available to train networks to recognize. Here, we present a novel machine learning approach we call pairwise assignment training for classifying heterogeneity (PATCH) that is capable of identifying individual artistic practice regimes with no external training data. We apply this method to two historical paintings by the Spanish Renaissance master, El Greco, and our findings regarding one of the works potentially challenge previous studies that assert that a considerable portion of the painting was completed by workshop members after El Greco's death. PATCH outperforms statistical and unsupervised machine learning methods in this complex pairwise comparison problem lacking "ground truth" data, making it potentially useful across similar cases in the social and natural sciences, including image segmentation in remote sensing, urban development and design, and anomaly detection manufacturing contexts, among others.

Identifiers

PMID41996503
PMCPMC13089327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.