ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Leveraging deep learning to infer continuous predictions from ordinal labels in medical imaging.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Toward AI-Assisted Precision Diagnostics in Breast Cancer: Source-Group-Preserving Evaluation of Class-Imbalance Strategies for Ordered ER-IHC Segmentation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In clinical medicine, variables like disease severity are often categorized into discrete ordinal labels such as normal/mild/moderate/severe. However, these labels, commonly used to train and evaluate disease severity prediction models, simplify an underlying continuous severity spectrum. Using continuous scores can aid in detecting small severity changes more sensitively over time. We introduce a deep learning based approach that predicts continuously valued variables from medical images using only discrete ordinal labels during model development. We evaluated this approach using three medical imaging datasets: disease severity prediction for retinopathy of prematurity and knee osteoarthritis, and breast density prediction from mammograms. Deep learning models were trained with discrete labels, and model outputs were transformed into continuous scores. These were then compared against detailed expert severity assessments, which exceeded the granularity of training labels. Our study explored conventional and Monte Carlo dropout multi-class classification, ordinal classification, regression, and twin models. We found that models incorporating the ordinal nature of training labels significantly outperformed conventional multi-class classification. Notably, continuous scores from ordinal classification and regression models demonstrated a higher correlation with expert severity rankings and lower mean squared errors than multi-class models. The application of Monte Carlo dropout further enhanced the prediction accuracy of continuously valued scores, aligning closely with the continuous target variable. Our findings confirm that accurate continuous scores can be learned from discrete ordinal labels using deep learning, offering a robust method that effectively bridges the gap between discrete and continuous data across various image analysis tasks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.