ArticlePloS one2026
Evaluating pump-assisted larval transfer for scaling coral larval restoration interventions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Globally, multiple techniques are being trialed to accelerate ecosystem recovery in shallow coastal habitats. One technique aims to boost propagule supply in areas where the current supply is insufficient to re-establish depleted populations to ecologically significant levels. However, transferring large quantities of propagules requires large-scale methods to be tested to ensure safe and efficient collection and deployment into degraded habitats. This study aims to determine if the mass transfer of coral larvae through pumping techniques affects their survival, locomotion and settlement potential. A pilot experiment tested the effects of pumping at two flow rates, and a gravity-fed control, on Acropora cf. tenuis larval survival and settlement across four larval ages. Following pumping at days 2-5 following spawning, larval mortality rates were typically low (~0.8% and ~3% for low and high flow, respectively) and settlement rates similar. A subsequent experiment then investigated the effects of pumping on a mixed larval assemblage following in situ wild spawn slick collection and cultivation. Findings were similar to those of the pilot, confirming low average mortality rates (0.6-1%) with highest mortality (1.3%) for 3-day old larvae. At larval ages of 4-, 5- and 6-days post-spawning, pumping had no significant effects on locomotion abilities or settlement among larvae that were retrieved after transfer. For 3-day old larvae, locomotion following high flow pumping was marginally compromised, especially in the first minute following pumping, but locomotion increased significantly 5-10 minutes later. Larvae that were 3-days old and subjected to pumping (low or high) exhibited approximately 50% lower settlement rates compared to the control group. In contrast, no effects on settlement due to pumping were observed for 4-, 5-, or 6-day old larvae. Larval transfer, regardless of the technique employed, resulted in losses ranging from 21-27%. Losses were likely caused by some larvae becoming trapped in the fine mesh filter nets after transfer or lost through the aquarium system, with the extent of loss varying with the developmental stage of the larvae. Overall, results highlight that pumping coral larvae with a diaphragm pump can effectively facilitate their mass transfer when conducted from 4-days post-spawning onwards, at which point larvae are fully developed, motile and acquiring competency. Pumping techniques can therefore be utilized to facilitate increasing the rates and scales of larval restoration operations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.