ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Equity, accessibility, and public health implications of digital platforms delivering real-time air quality information: A technology review.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
According to the World Health Organization, air pollution is the largest environmental risk to global health, with 99% of the world's population living in areas exceeding recommended guidelines. Providing real-time air quality information through mobile or web-based applications, alongside behavioural guidance, represents a key strategy for reducing individual exposure and improving population health. Such information is delivered at varying geographic and temporal scales and has become increasingly widespread and decentralised. However, there is limited understanding of the quality, characteristics, and potential health impacts of digitally available air quality information and messaging. This study addresses this gap through a systematic technology review of publicly available digital platforms ("channels") that share real-time local air pollution data. Using the UK as a case study, computational methods were applied to examine how data underpinning existing channels (websites, mobile applications, sensors, etc.) are generated and by whom. Systematic searches of Google, the Google Play Store (Android), and Apple App Store (iOS) were conducted using SerpAPI and predefined search terms. In total, 146 channels met inclusion criteria and were analysed. Channel metadata were used to identify trends in channel types, evolution over time, and emerging patterns across the digital information landscape. The review also compares differences in available information across channels but is limited to those accessible in the UK and excludes real-time social media data due to cost and access constraints. Finally, the study considers demographic and social factors influencing access to air quality information and its exposure-reducing benefits. These findings contribute to understanding the production and use of digital air quality information with global public health relevance.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.