Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996456›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Development of a layer-wise in-situ laser-based dimensional monitoring system with post-mechanical characterization of synthesized polylactic acid 3D prints in FDM additive manufacturing.

Vishal V Shukla, Yogesh G Joshi, Niraj Kumar Dewangan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Vishal V ShuklaSchool of Engineering Sciences, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur, India.
Yogesh G JoshiSchool of Engineering Sciences, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University, Ramdeobaba University, Nagpur, India.
Niraj Kumar DewanganManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1001-4858

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-dimensional accuracy is difficult to obtain in 3D printing techniques such as Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). The study was conducted in two phases. In the first phase, the causes of dimensional inaccuracy in FDM printing were reviewed and a new Laser-Based Dimensional Measurement System (LDMS) was produced. Two FDM printers, Ultimaker Extended and Creality Ender 3 Pro, were used in experiments to investigate the impacts of material deposition, over-extrusion, print speed, under-extrusion, mechanical vibrations, and temperature variation on dimensional accuracy. The third stage involved the synthesis of PLA material, which was then extruded into a capillary and used for 3D printing by the LDMS system. The printed samples were characterized using tensile, hardness, and flexural tests, as well as XRD, FTIR, SEM, and TG/DA analyses. It was also demonstrated that the LDMS provides in-situ layer-wise dimensional monitoring during intermediate stages of the building process. The obtained PLA polymers were biodegradable and amorphous. It was also noted that the printed parts could withstand lateral loads better than longitudinal loads, and, in compression, they were stronger than in tension.This research work supports SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) by improving material efficiency and promoting biodegradable PLA.

Indexed as

LasersPolyestersPrinting, Three-DimensionalHardnessMaterials TestingTensile StrengthPolyesterspoly(lactide)

Identifiers

PMID41996456
PMCPMC13089872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.