Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996448›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Toward compassionate workplaces: Employers' and employees' perspectives on serious illness, dying, death, and grief: Findings from a nationwide online survey in Germany.

Helena Kukla, Tobias Lang, Melanie Joshi, Karin Ohler, Golrokh Esmaili, Georg Bollig, Raymond Voltz, Julia Strupp

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Helena KuklaDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4337-9666
Tobias LangDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Melanie JoshiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0130-3348
Karin OhlerDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Golrokh EsmailiDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Georg BolligDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Raymond VoltzDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Julia StruppDepartment of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3135-2693

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperiences of serious illness, dying, death, and grief in the workplace significantly affect employee well-being, productivity, and organizational culture. Despite increasing recognition of their importance, there is limited understanding of workplace perspectives in Germany. This study addresses this gap by examining the attitudes and experiences of employees and employers regarding these issues to inform workplace policies that promote well-being and resilience.

methodsWe conducted a nationwide representative cross-sectional online survey (n = 1,127) using a self-developed questionnaire with closed and open-ended items. Data were collected from managers and non-managers across multiple sectors to identify key themes, challenges, and opportunities for improving workplace practices. Closed-ended questions were analyzed quantitatively, and open-ended responses qualitatively.

findingsMore than sixty-three percent (63.1%) of respondents reported having been affected within the past five years. Workplace support was limited, with 42.7% seldom or never receiving managerial support. Informal support from colleagues and managers was more common and often preferred over formal provisions. Employees valued understanding, empathy, and availability, whereas managers emphasized structural measures such as leave policies. Barriers, uncertainties, and a strong need for guidance and training were frequently reported. Employees in smaller companies expressed greater concerns about legal consequences and stronger support needs, while larger organizations more often offered formal guidelines and programs.

conclusionsThe mismatch between employees' needs and managerial focus underscores the importance of aligning workplace practices with employee expectations. Training, guidance, and initiatives that integrate psychosocial and structural support could strengthen well-being and enhance organizational resilience.

Indexed as

EmpathyGriefWorkplaceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDeathFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesWorking Conditions

Identifiers

PMID41996448
PMCPMC13089879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.