Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996418›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Pretraining effective T5 generative models for clinical and biomedical applications.

Saad Althabiti, Chuming Chen, Sultan Alrowili, Cathy Wu, K Vijay-Shanker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saad AlthabitiDepartment of Health Informatics, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3600-4832
Chuming ChenCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.
Sultan AlrowiliIBM Research, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Cathy WuCenter for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6379-8601
K Vijay-ShankerDepartment of Computer & Information Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the impact of corpus selection and vocabulary design on the performance of T5-based language models in clinical and biomedical domains. We introduce five different T5-EHR models, each pretrained from scratch using different combinations of clinical and biomedical corpora alongside domain-specific vocabularies. We evaluated these models across a variety of clinical and biomedical tasks to quantify the impact of pretraining data and vocabulary tokenization choices on downstream performance. Our findings reveal the importance of aligning both pretraining corpus and vocabulary with the target domain. Models pretrained exclusively on clinical data achieve superior performance on clinical tasks, while adding biomedical data contributes only marginal gains in most cases, with a few exceptions. Similarly, the choice of vocabulary significantly influences model performance, with clinical-specific vocabularies outperforming general biomedical vocabularies in tasks requiring a deeper understanding of clinical language. Also, the T5 generative models perform competitively with state-of-the-art discriminative models on several biomedical benchmarks, demonstrating strong generalization to biomedical domain. Overall, these results emphasize that task-specific selection of corpus and vocabulary is essential for optimizing model performance in clinical and biomedical natural language processing (NLP).

Indexed as

Natural Language ProcessingGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansLarge Language ModelsVocabularyVocabulary, Controlled

Identifiers

PMID41996418
PMCPMC13089888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.