ArticlePloS one2026
Enhancing generalizability in classification of peripheral neural recordings with graph neural network.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The peripheral nervous system plays a crucial role in facilitating communication between biological systems. However, decoding neural signals from peripheral nerve recordings remains a challenge due to their complex spatiotemporal patterns. In this study, we propose a graph-based learning approach to more effectively capture temporal and spatial information for classifying neural signal patterns. Unlike previous work, our method incorporates the physical geometry of the nerve cuff, addressing the underrepresented relationships between electrodes. We used a publicly available dataset consisting of neural recordings from eight Long-Evans rats, obtained using a 56-channel nerve cuff electrode. We constructed graphs where each node represents the time series recorded from an electrode, and edges correspond to the distances between electrodes along the surface of the nerve cuff (e.g., geodesic distance). We employed a leave-one-out strategy to evaluate the generalizability of the approach. We further evaluated the within-rat performance of the model by training on two folds and testing on the remaining fold of each rat's data. In generalizability evaluation, we achieved a mean F1 score of 65.03%, representing a 17.74% improvement over the previous study, and in within-rat testing, we achieved a mean F1 score of 77.50%, representing a 3.14% increase. These findings highlight the value of incorporating the recording geometry into model design, particularly in this small dataset setting, where explicit spatial priors help compensate for limited training examples and improve decoding performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.