ArticlePloS one2026
Implicit association tests for all: Using iatgen for non-English and offline samples.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Intergroup Time Bias and Its Implications for Medical Healthcare.The Journal of social issues · 2025Article
- Healthcare providers' psychological investment in clinical recommendations: Investigating the role of implicit racial attitudes.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2024Article
- Intergroup time bias and aversive racism in the medical context.Journal of personality and social psychology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Implicit Association Test (IAT) has become an invaluable tool for researchers in many fields. The IAT is a sorting task that measures the strength of automatic associations between targets (e.g., flowers / insects) and attributes (e.g., pleasant / unpleasant). Several programs exist to create and run IAT studies, and each has unique advantages and disadvantages. Yet most share the same limitations: being general-purpose data collection tools that require time to master, requiring extra steps to run online (e.g., deploying a web server), and having no IAT-data analysis features. This increases researcher reliance on pre-made templates that typically operate only in English and are difficult to translate. Iatgen addresses some of these issues by allowing researchers to design and analyze IATs through a simple web-interface, to easily combine IATs with experimental manipulations or other measures in Qualtrics, and to analyze data using the same web-interface. However, until recently, the problem of monolingual, English-only capability remained. In this paper, we introduce iatgen's new translation functionality, which allows users to create non-English IATs using the web-based iatgen Shiny app and the tr.iatgen R package. Users are invited to contribute to the translation repository in GitHub by submitting and reviewing IAT translations. We also describe a method for deploying Qualtrics-based IATs in offline environments. We hope this increased functionality will facilitate cross-cultural research and reduce the negative effects of disproportionately Western, educated, industrialized, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.