ArticlePloS one2026
Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies as significant predictors of english writing proficiency in Chinese EFL senior high school students.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Self-efficacy and self-regulated learning strategies are crucial importance for enhancing the writing proficiency of foreign language learners. This study employed a cross-sectional design to examine the relationships among writing self-efficacy, writing self-regulated learning strategies and writing proficiency in Chinese senior high school students learning English as a foreign language (EFL). A convenience sample of 223 participants completed a writing test and two adapted questionnaires: the Questionnaire of English Writing Self-Efficacy (QEWSE) and the Questionnaire of English Writing SRL Strategies (QEWSRLS). Both instruments were adapted the participants' actual situation and showed good reliability and validity. Students' writing proficiency was assessed based on essays scored by two independent raters. Correlation analysis was used to examine the relationships between these constructs and writing performance, and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to establish and validate the measurement models. The results showed significant positive relationships between the constructs, indicating that higher levels of self-efficacy and greater use of SRL strategies are associated with better writing performance. There is robust construct validity for both measurement models: a five-dimensional model of writing self-efficacy (RMSEA = 0.030) and a nine-dimensional model of writing SRL strategies (RMSEA = 0.027). These findings underscore the importance of integrating psychological and strategic factors into pedagogical practices to enhance EFL writing instruction in similar contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.