ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Machine Learning-Based Pattern Recognition of Risk Factors for Low Back Pain among Adolescent Cricket Players in Dhaka City.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is common among adolescent cricketers, often due to repetitive lumbar stress. This study investigated LBP among 450 adolescent cricketers in Dhaka City, Bangladesh, considering a range of factors, including sociodemographic characteristics, game-related activities, preventive practices, and LBP-related history. Various ML algorithms applied to LBP severity classification included K-Nearest Neighbors, Random Forest, Logistic Regression, and Support Vector Machine (SVM). LBP severity was categorized into three classes as no pain, mild pain, and moderate pain because there was an insufficient amount of data for the severe pain category. The SVM using the sigmoid kernel of the models considered gave the best performance as it produced the best performance metrics of test accuracy (87.6%), precision (90%), recall (87.6%), and F1-score (87.1%). In addition, regression analysis was also applied to identify the predictors of LBP. Key correlates included female gender (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.52), higher educational attainment (e.g., undergraduate: AOR = 5.38), elevated family income (e.g., > 60,000 BDT: AOR = 4.36), longer weekly practice duration (>20 hours: higher prevalence of 81.7%), inconsistent warm-up (often/sometimes: AOR = 12.48-14.07) and cool-down practices (sometimes: AOR = 2.86), and prior LBP history (AOR = 6.92), all significantly associated with increased LBP risk (p < 0.05). The findings show the importance of early intervention and prevention protocols for minimizing LBP occurrence among junior cricket players. In short, this work demonstrates the effectiveness of ML and regression models for ascertaining sports injury patterns of risk, data-informed prevention and management protocols, and providing a foundation for future studies on this subject. Limitations include the exclusion of a severe pain category due to insufficient data, which reduces the model's capacity to triage urgent cases requiring immediate intervention.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.