ArticlePloS one2026
Functional hearing and low frequency hearing preservation after cochlear implant surgery is achievable with FLEX electrode arrays: Real world evidence from the MEHS Registry.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study uses data from the MED-EL Hearing Solutions (MEHS) multicenter registry to examine the impact of a series of flexible lateral wall electrode arrays on postoperative low frequency hearing preservation (LFHP) of cochlear implant (CI) users. Participants were members of the MEHS registry who had received a MED-EL CI with a FLEX electrode array. LFHP was evaluated using 2 formulae: the Vienna Consensus (VC), which assesses hearing preservation at 250‒1000 Hz; and the Minimum Reporting Standards for Adult Cochlear American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO), which assesses hearing preservation at 125‒500 Hz. LFHP was assessed via air conduction preoperatively and between 6 and 36 months postoperatively. LFHP was achievable with all the FLEX arrays evaluated, regardless of length. With the VC, 60% of ears (n = 95) had complete or partial LFHP at 6‒12 months postoperatively and 68.4% (n = 19) had complete or partial LFHP at 24‒36 months postoperatively. With the AAO, 43.4% of ears (n = 83) had LFHP at 6‒12 months postoperatively and 84.2% (n = 19) had functional low frequency residual hearing at 24‒36 months postoperatively. In conclusion, implantation with FLEX electrode arrays can preserve functional low-frequency residual hearing up to three years after implantation. The MEHS multicenter registry appears to be a valuable tool for collecting large amounts of real-world data from CI users despite challenges in harvesting usable data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.