Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996209›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)2026

Discrimination in autism as measured by minimal group and sheer difference experiments.

Zachary Tan, Xizhuo Zou, Daniel P Skorich, Eliane Deschrijver

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Zachary TanSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Xizhuo ZouSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Daniel P SkorichSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland, Australia.
Eliane DeschrijverSchool of Psychology, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-3539

Funding

Australian Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autistic individuals often show fewer social biases than neurotypical people. Whether they show fewer discriminatory tendencies is however unclear. The present study examined discriminatory tendencies in autistic versus neurotypical individuals in the minimal group paradigm and the novel 'sheer difference' paradigm. Seventy-five autistic and neurotypical participants were recruited for each group, totalling 150 participants. In the 'sheer difference' paradigm, participants received a coin toss outcome in each trial, after which they were tasked to assign points to a single other participant who had received the same versus a different coin flip outcome. In the minimal group paradigm, participants were assigned to a group based on coin flips, and then, they assigned points to members of their own group versus the other group. The 'sheer difference' paradigm contributes to the study's aims by testing in autism whether discrimination can also follow from individual rather than group-based difference versus sameness. We found that discriminatory tendencies can come about on both individual and group levels. We did not find clear differences between autistic and neurotypical populations, with implications for the way in which we conceptualize discrimination and understand autism.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderDiscrimination, PsychologicalSocial PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSocial GroupYoung Adultautismdiscriminationminimal group paradigmsheer difference

Identifiers

PMID41996209
PMCPMC13655983

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.