Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996090›Full record

ArticleBioMed research international2026

Standardization of a Supramaximal Stimulation Protocol for Electrophysiological Assessment of the Intact Rat Median Nerve.

Tiago Bastos Taboada, Fernanda Marques Pestana, Julia Teixeira Oliveira, Geraldo Marco Rosa Junior, Henrique Rocha Mendonça, Beatriz Theodoro da Silva, Natália Tavares de Campos, Fernanda Martins de Almeida, Ana Maria Blanco Martinez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BioMed research international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tiago Bastos TaboadaLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Fernanda Marques PestanaLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Julia Teixeira OliveiraLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Geraldo Marco Rosa JuniorGraduate Program in Pathological Anatomy, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Henrique Rocha MendonçaLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Beatriz Theodoro da SilvaLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Natália Tavares de CamposLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Fernanda Martins de AlmeidaLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.
Ana Maria Blanco MartinezLaboratory of Neurodegeneration and Repair, Department of Pathological Anatomy, Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, ufrj.br.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-5730

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoCoordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionElectroneuromyography (ENMG) is the gold-standard method for assessing peripheral nerve function through compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude and latency. However, methodological heterogeneity across studies limits reproducibility and comparability, particularly regarding stimulation intensity and electrode configuration.

objectiveThis study is aimed at standardizing an ENMG protocol for the intact median nerve in rats by defining the minimal supramaximal stimulation intensity required to evoke maximal CMAP amplitude with stable latency.

methodsA total of 10 adult male Wistar rats (250-300 g) were anesthetized with ketamine and xylazine. The right median nerve was surgically exposed at the brachial plexus level. A bipolar hook electrode delivered square-wave pulses (0.1 ms, 1 Hz) at descending intensities (20-0.1 V), with a 60-s interval between intensity blocks. CMAPs were recorded from the flexor digitorum superficialis using monopolar needle electrodes. Signals were amplified (10 Hz-10 kHz band-pass) and digitized at 20 kHz. Amplitude and latency were analyzed across intensities to determine the supramaximal plateau.

resultsCMAP amplitude reached a plateau between 20 and 10 V, indicating full motor unit recruitment. Below 10 V, amplitude decreased progressively, and no response was observed at 0.1 V. Latency remained stable within the supramaximal range and increased only near threshold intensities.

conclusionThis study establishes a standardized supramaximal stimulation parameter (10 V) for electrophysiological assessment of the intact rat median nerve. Defining this reference intensity enhances methodological consistency and supports reproducibility in experimental models of peripheral nerve research.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsElectric StimulationElectromyographyMedian NerveAnimalsMaleNerve Conduction StudiesRatsRats, Wistar

Identifiers

PMID41996090
PMCPMC13089196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.