ArticleJournal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education2026
Development of a Patient Question Prompt List for Older Adults with Early-Stage Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer.
Article in Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older women with early-stage hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor-2-positive (HER2-) breast cancer face many preference-based decisions regarding the treatment they receive, as some therapies can be safely omitted. Our objective was to develop a question-prompt list for patients >70 with early-stage HR+/HER2- breast cancer for use at their initial surgical consultation. We recruited women diagnosed at age ≥ 70 with cT1-2N0 HR+/HER2- breast cancer in the past year to participate in virtual focus group about their experience gathering information about their diagnosis and treatment, and to gather feedback on a question-prompt list. Baseline questionnaires were gathered and focus groups were then recorded and transcribed. A codebook was developed based on a combination of deductive and inductive codes. The research team conducted a thematic analysis and made iterative revisions to the list. Four focus groups were conducted with 4-5 participants in each (n=19 participants). The average age of participants was 74.1 (SD 3.2); 18 were non-Hispanic White. Major themes included: 1) patients and physicians share responsibility for meeting patients’ informational needs, 2) a question-prompt list is one of many helpful strategies for cancer information gathering, and 3) question-prompt lists must account for different needs by phase in the cancer journey. We developed a question-prompt list that was found useful to women ≥70 with HR+/HER-2- early-stage breast cancer. Next, we will test the effects of this list on patient-engagement and the quality of patient-physician conversations at initial breast surgical oncology consultations in a pilot trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.