ReviewStem cell reviews and reports2026
Repairing the Infarcted Heart: Preclinical Outcomes of Cardiac Tissue Engineering.
Review in Stem cell reviews and reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocardial infarction (MI) remains a leading cause of cardiovascular mortality, driven by irreversible cardiomyocyte loss and the limited regenerative capacity of the adult heart. Conventional pharmacological and interventional therapies reduce acute injury yet rarely restore functional myocardium, motivating bioengineering strategies to enhance repair. This review synthesizes recent preclinical advances in biomaterial-based cardiac tissue engineering, with an emphasis on engineered cardiac patches and injectable hydrogels evaluated in vivo, alongside early human translation where available. We briefly contextualize commonly used cell sources as components of engineered platforms. We then relate emerging biomaterial systems, including immunomodulatory and reactive oxygen species (ROS)–responsive hydrogels, conductive/electroactive scaffolds, and mechanically supportive patches, to phase-specific post-infarction pathophysiology, highlighting design features that can modulate inflammation, fibrosis, vascularization, and electrical conduction. Across platforms, reported benefits predominantly reflect microenvironmental modulation and structural remodeling, whereas durable, large-scale remuscularization remains uncommon and introduces distinct manufacturing, regulatory, and safety challenges. Finally, we frame bioengineering approaches by mechanism, disease stage, and delivery context to outline design principles and translational priorities for clinically meaningful MI repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41996047What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.