Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41996003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Promptable segmentation with region exploration enables minimal-effort expert-level prostate cancer delineation.

Junqing Yang, Natasha Thorley, Ahmed Nadeem Abbasi, Shonit Punwani, Zion Tse, Yipeng Hu, Shaheer U Saeed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Junqing YangUCL Hawkes Institute; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Natasha ThorleyCentre of Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Ahmed Nadeem AbbasiDepartment of Oncology, Aga Khan University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan.
Shonit PunwaniCentre of Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK.
Zion TseCentre for Bioengineering; School of Engineering and Materials Science, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Yipeng HuUCL Hawkes Institute; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK.
Shaheer U SaeedUCL Hawkes Institute; Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK. shaheer.saeed@qmul.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5004-0663

Funding

Cancer Research UK C73666/A31378]Cancer Research UK [EDDAPA-2024/100014]
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate segmentation of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance (MR) images is crucial for planning image-guided interventions such as targeted biopsies, cryoablation, and radiotherapy. However, subtle and variable tumour appearances, differences in imaging protocols, and limited expert availability make consistent interpretation difficult. While automated methods aim to address this, they rely on large expertly annotated datasets that are often inconsistent, whereas manual delineation remains labour-intensive. This work aims to bridge the gap between automated and manual segmentation through a framework driven by user-provided point prompts, enabling accurate segmentation with minimal annotation effort.

methodsThe framework combines reinforcement learning (RL) with a region-growing segmentation process guided by user prompts. Starting from an initial point prompt, region-growing generates a preliminary segmentation, which is iteratively refined through RL. At each step, the RL agent observes the image and current segmentation to predict a new point, from which region growing updates the mask. A reward, balancing segmentation accuracy and voxel-wise uncertainty, encourages exploration of ambiguous regions, allowing the agent to escape local optima and perform sample-specific optimisation. Despite requiring fully supervised training, the framework bridges manual and fully automated segmentation at inference by substantially reducing user effort while outperforming current fully automated methods.

resultsThe framework was evaluated on two public prostate MR datasets (PROMIS and PICAI, with 566 and 1090 cases). It outperformed the previous best automated methods by 9.9% and 8.9%, respectively, with performance comparable to manual radiologist segmentation, reducing annotation time tenfold.

conclusionBy combining prompting with RL-driven exploration, the framework achieves radiologist-level prostate cancer segmentation with a fraction of the annotation effort, highlighting the potential of RL to enable adaptive and efficient cancer delineation. Code: URL: github.com/JQ-Sakura/prostate-rl-segmentation.

Indexed as

Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleReinforcement Machine LearningDeep learningPromptable segmentationProstate cancerReinforcement learning

Identifiers

PMID41996003
PMCPMC13354628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.