SynthesisJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Efficacy and safety of early intravenous administration of tirofiban after thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the cornerstone of reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS), yet only a minority of patients achieve functional independence with vessel re-occlusion in up to one-third of cases. IVT targets fibrin but does not inhibit platelet aggregation, providing a rationale for adjunctive early platelet inhibition; so in this context tirofiban, a short-acting glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist, may synergize with thrombolysis, favoring better outcome for AIS patients. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis up to August 2025 on MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) of RCTs assessing efficacy and safety of early intravenous infusion of tirofiban after thrombolysis in AIS. Outcomes presented as forest plot included functional independence (mRS 0-2), excellent outcome (mRS 0-1), mortality, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), any ICH and early neurological deterioration (END). Risk of Bias was evaluated through Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. Five RCTs (1,428 patients) were included. At 90 days, functional independence occurred in 78.7% tirofiban-treated versus in 67.8% control patients (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.05-1.40), with a lower number of END in tirofiban group (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.15-0.82). Excellent outcome did not significantly differ (RR 2.72, 95% CI 0.26-27.97), as well as mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.55-2.09), overall ICH rate (RR 1.14, 95% CI 0.75-1.72) and sICH (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.41-7.42), although an increased number of sICH was observed in tirofiban group. Tirofiban after thrombolysis may be associated with higher rates of functional independence and reduced END. However, given the very low certainty of evidence due to substantial heterogeneity, and imprecision, this meta-analysis should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating, and larger RCTs are required to confirm these findings. PROSPERO: number 1230163.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41995942What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.