ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
External Beam Radiation Therapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is an aggressive primary liver malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. Most patients present with unresectable disease, with mortality frequently driven by intrahepatic tumor burden and liver failure, making local control (LC) a central treatment goal. External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plays an expanding role in multidisciplinary care, enabled by modern planning, image guidance, and motion management techniques that permit safe dose escalation. Across definitive EBRT series, a consistent dose–response relationship is observed. Higher biologically effective doses (BED) have been associated with improved outcomes, with BED > 80.5 Gy achieving superior 3-year LC and overall survival (OS) compared with lower-dose regimens. Dose-escalated approaches have reported 2-year LC rates of 80–90% and median OS approaching 20–30 months in selected patients. Advanced technologies such as proton beam therapy and MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the therapeutic ratio, with reported grade 3 or higher toxicity rates below 8% and one- to two-year LC rates exceeding 90% in PBT series. Beyond definitive therapy, EBRT contributes to tumor downstaging, enabling surgical resection in approximately 10–30% of initially unresectable patients, and may improve survival in selected metastatic or liver-dominant disease. Early-phase data combining EBRT with immune checkpoint inhibition are emerging and warrant prospective validation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.