Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995933›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2026

Incisional hernia repair trends in the last decade (2013-2023): an ACHQC analysis.

Diego L Lima, Raquel Nogueira, João P G Kasakewitch, Maria Clara Morais, Augusto Graziani E Sousa, Sofia Wagemaker Viana, Sharon Phillips, Prashanth Sreeramoju

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Diego L LimaDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Hospital, NY, The Bronx, USA. dilaurentino@gmail.com.
Raquel NogueiraDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Hospital, NY, The Bronx, USA.
João P G KasakewitchDepartment of Surgery, NYU Long Island, Long Island, NY, USA.
Maria Clara MoraisDepartment of Surgery, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York, NY, USA.
Augusto Graziani E SousaCentro Universitário de Anápolis, Anápolis, Goiás, Brazil.
Sofia Wagemaker VianaKursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia.
Sharon PhillipsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Prashanth SreeramojuDepartment of Surgery, Montefiore Hospital, NY, The Bronx, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThis study evaluates trends in incisional hernia repair techniques and their associated outcomes over 10 years. It hypothesizes that advancements in surgical techniques have led to an increase in minimally invasive procedures, resulting in a subsequent decrease in 30-day postoperative complications. MATERIAL &

methodsA retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative (ACHQC) database was conducted from January 2013 to December 2023. Adult patients who underwent incisional ventral hernia repair via open, laparoscopic, or robotic approaches with mesh and 30-day follow-up were included. Data analysis focused on patient demographics, operative details, and postoperative outcomes.

results17,078 patients were included after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Over time, a notable shift in surgical techniques was observed. The use of a robotic approach increased from 10% (259) (2013–2015) to 48% (1562) (2022–2023), while open surgeries decreased from 63% (n = 1542) to 46% (n = 1550) in the same period. Median hernia length increased from 10 cm to 11 cm (p < 0.001), while hernia width remained stable (p = 0.5). Both mesh length and width increased significantly (p < 0.001). TAP block use increased from 0% to 20% (p < 0.001). Mesh positioning shifted toward sublay placement (91% to 96%, p < 0.001), particularly retromuscular (43% to 62%, p < 0.001), while intraperitoneal mesh placement declined from 37% to 23% (p < 0.001). Mesh fixation techniques have also changed: use of tackers decreased (35% to 12%, p < 0.001), adhesive use increased (5% to 14%, p < 0.001), and suture use remained stable (p = 0.2). Myofascial release became more frequent (46% to 60%, p < 0.001), along with increased fascial closure (86% to 95%, p < 0.001). Transversus abdominis release increased (59% to 64%, p = 0.01), while external oblique release declined (9% to 2%, p < 0.001). 30-day readmission rates slightly decreased (5% to 4%, p = 0.005), while intraoperative complication rates remained low and stable (2–3%, p = 0.05).

conclusionThe findings of this study highlight a significant trend toward minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of incisional hernias over the past 10 years. This shift is accompanied by consistently low early postoperative complications, despite larger hernial defect repairs and the larger mesh.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphyIncisional HerniaAgedFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgical MeshIncisional herniaMinimally invasive surgeryRobotic surgeryVentral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.