ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2026
Low-grade neuroepithelial tumor with FGFR1::TACC1 fusion: a clinicopathologic analysis of seven cases.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo characterize the clinicopathologic, radiologic, immunophenotypic, and molecular features of low-grade neuroepithelial tumor harboring FGFR1::TACC1 fusion.
methodsSeven cases with confirmed FGFR1::TACC1 fusion were retrospectively analyzed. Clinical information, histopathological features, immunohistochemical profiles, next-generation sequencing (NGS) results and DNA methylation–based clustering analyses were reviewed.
resultsAll patients were male, with a median age of 14 years. Tumors were predominantly located in the cerebellum. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed mainly cystic–solid lesions with hypointensity on T1-weighted imaging and relatively well-defined margins on FLAIR sequences. Histologically, all tumors exhibited oligodendroglia-like cells with round nuclei and perinuclear halos, accompanied by neurofibrillary islands and edematous stroma. Branching capillaries (6/7), calcifications (4/7), and Rosenthal fibers (3/7) were variably observed. One case demonstrated morphologic and immunophenotypic features overlapping with extraventricular neurocytoma. Immunohistochemistry demonstrated GFAP and Olig2 expression in all cases; Syn positivity was identified in four cases and focal NeuN positivity in two cases. Focal CD34 expression was found in one. The Ki-67 was below 5% in all tumors. NGS confirmed FGFR1::TACC1 fusion in every case. DNA methylation profiling assigned tumors to multiple reference classes, including low-grade glioma (LGG), dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumor (DNT), pilocytic astrocytoma, posterior fossa (PA PF) and anaplastic pilocytic astrocytoma (ANA PA). No significant chromosomal arm-level copy number alterations were detected. All patients underwent gross resection, with one receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. No tumor recurrence was observed during follow-up (36–60 months).
conclusionLow-grade neuroepithelial tumors with FGFR1::TACC1 fusion represent a heterogeneous entity where a single recurrent gene fusion may be associated with diverse histomorphologic features and variable DNA methylation profiles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41995891What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.