Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995877›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2026

Effect of a one time guideline based educational video intervention on osteoporosis related knowledge.

Anna-Lena Hauser, Javier-Fernando Noriega Urena, Levan Saatashvili, Firas Esmail, Tobias Lange, Tobias Ludger Schulte, Alexander von Glinski

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Osteoporosis-related knowledge in a German adult population: determinants and translational implications for fragility fracture prevention.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Anna-Lena HauserOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany. anna-lena.hauser@klinikum-bochum.de.
Javier-Fernando Noriega UrenaOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Levan SaatashviliOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Firas EsmailOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias LangeOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Tobias Ludger SchulteOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Alexander von GlinskiOrthopedic University Clinic at St. Josef Hospital Bochum, University Hospitals of the Ruhr-University of Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOsteoporosis remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, partly due to insufficient patient knowledge. This study aimed to assess osteoporosis-related knowledge and to evaluate the immediate and short-term effects of a one-time educational intervention through a guideline-based video in an adult online population. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this prospective, randomized controlled trial, adults aged ≥ 18 years were recruited via an established online panel. Participants were randomized to an intervention group, which viewed a standardized educational video on osteoporosis, or a control group without intervention. Osteoporosis knowledge was assessed using the Facts on Osteoporosis Quiz (FOOQ) and the Osteoporosis Knowledge Assessment Tool (OKAT). Knowledge retention was evaluated in the intervention group after one week. Between-group comparisons were performed using Man-Whitney U tests, χ² tests, and odds ratios.

resultsA total of 513 participants were included (intervention group: n = 198; control group: n = 315), with no significant differences in baseline demographic or clinical characteristics. Immediately after the intervention, osteoporosis-related knowledge was significantly higher in the intervention group compared with controls, as measured by both OKAT (11.6 vs. 8.8 points, p < 0.0001) and FOOQ (13.2 vs. 11.1 points, p < 0.0001). The proportion of participants with poor knowledge (FOOQ ≤ 10 points) was lower in the intervention group (20.7% vs. 41.3%; OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.24–0.56), while good knowledge (FOOQ ≥ 15 points) was more frequent (37.9% vs. 17.5%; OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.92–4.30). At 1-week follow-up (n = 65), knowledge scores in the intervention group remained significantly higher than baseline control values for both FOOQ and OKAT (all p < 0.005), indicating short-term knowledge retention.

conclusionA brief, guideline-based educational video significantly improves osteoporosis-related knowledge, with substantial retention after one week. Video-based education represents an effective, scalable tool to enhance patient understanding of osteoporosis and may support future prevention and management strategies.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeOsteoporosisPatient Education as TopicAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicProspective StudiesVideo RecordingHealth literacyOsteoporosisOsteoporosis knowledgePatient educationRandomized controlled trialVideo-based intervention

Identifiers

PMID41995877
PMCPMC13090292

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.