Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995835›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2026

Development and external validation of a novel prediction model for the TraumaTriage App.

Max Gulickx, Robin D Lokerman, Rogier van der Sluijs, Rinske M Tuinema, Risco van Vliet, Falco Hietbrink, Rolf H H Groenwold, Mark van Heijl

Abstract readMulticenter StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Max GulickxDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, C04.332, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands. m.gulickx@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6650-5368
Robin D LokermanDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, C04.332, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1218-0200
Rogier van der SluijsDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1187-9922
Rinske M TuinemaRegional Ambulance Facilities Utrecht, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Risco van VlietRegional Ambulance Facilities Brabant Midden-West-Noord, 's- Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6376-0603
Falco HietbrinkDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, C04.332, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1462-6840
Rolf H H GroenwoldDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9238-6999
Mark van HeijlDepartment of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, C04.332, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht, 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5896-744X

Funding

Innovatiefonds Zorgverzekeraars 3383ZonMw 843004114
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAccurate pre-hospital trauma triage is essential for optimizing survival and functional outcomes within inclusive trauma systems. A prediction model incorporated into the TraumaTriage App (TTApp) has been shown to improve patient allocation in the Netherlands, but was developed based on a relatively small cohort. This study aims to redevelop and improve the performance and applicability of the TTApp’s prediction model before nationwide implementation.

methodsIn this prospective multicenter cohort study, data from all trauma patients transported within two emergency medical service (EMS) regions (i.e., Brabant and Utrecht), between February 2015 and October 2019, were used to develop and externally validate a prediction model to identify severely injured adults (Injury Severity Score [ISS] ≥ 16) using routinely available pre-hospital data. A Gradient Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT) algorithm was applied, and model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination and calibration.

resultsThe development cohort included 51,001 patients (median age 63.8 years, median ISS 9), and the external validation cohort included 29,737 patients (median age 62.1 years, median ISS 9). In external validation, the GBDT model showed excellent discrimination (c-statistic 0.850; 95% CI, 0.837–0.863) and good calibration (calibration-in-the-large 0.009; slope 0.952). Sensitivity was 91.3% and 85.2% at specificity thresholds of 50% and 65%, respectively.

conclusionsThis externally validated prediction model effectively identifies severely injured patients in the pre-hospital setting and represents a first iteration towards enhancing the TTApp. Designed for use in urgent situations, the model allows predictions with incomplete data and shows potential to reduce undertriage rates toward 10% while maintaining acceptable overtriage levels.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesMobile ApplicationsTriageWounds and InjuriesAgedBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPrediction AlgorithmsProspective StudiesMachine learningPrediction modelPre-hospital careSevere injuryTrauma triage

Identifiers

PMID41995835
PMCPMC13090252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.