ArticleBlood advances2026
Evaluating AL-ISS within a BNP-based model for AL amyloidosis in the daratumumab era.
Article in Blood advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractSurvival in AL (light chain) amyloidosis is strongly influenced by the severity of cardiac involvement. The recently proposed AL International Staging System (AL-ISS) incorporates echocardiographic global longitudinal strain (GLS) to subdivide biomarker-defined stage IIIb disease into stages IIIb and IIIc; however, its prognostic relevance in the daratumumab era remains uncertain. We evaluated the AL-ISS GLS cutoff of 9% in 53 patients with newly diagnosed stage IIIb AL amyloidosis. Patients classified as proposed stage IIIc (GLS, 0%-9%) had higher baseline difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (dFLC; 300 vs 167 mg/L; P = .08), similar left ventricular wall thickness (14.5 vs 15.0 mm; P = .57), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 45% vs 55%; P = .02) compared with those with GLS >9%. GLS correlated moderately with LVEF (ρ = 0.47; P< .001). On multivariate analysis, LVEF <50% (hazard ratio [HR], 3.18; P = .006) and dFLC ≥180 mg/L (HR, 3.26; P = .003) independently predicted overall survival, whereas GLS did not. Median overall survival was longer in proposed stage IIIc disease (31 vs 13 months), reflecting greater use of daratumumab-based therapy (82% vs 25%). Among daratumumab-treated patients, survival did not differ by GLS category. These findings suggest limitations of GLS-based substaging in advanced cardiac AL amyloidosis in the daratumumab era.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.