Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41995745›Full record

ArticleBulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology2026

Aluminium Exposure in Understory Birds of Atlantic Forest Fragments in Brazil.

Renata Constant de Amorim Lemos, Daniela Santos Anunciação, Gisele Maria Nunes Vieira, Márcio Amorim Efe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renata Constant de Amorim LemosInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Biological Diversity and Conservation in the Tropics, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4565-8872
Daniela Santos AnunciaçãoLaboratory of Instrumentation and Development in Analytical Chemistry, Maceió, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6161-479X
Gisele Maria Nunes VieiraInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Biological Diversity and Conservation in the Tropics, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil.
Márcio Amorim EfeInstitute of Biological and Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Biological Diversity and Conservation in the Tropics, Federal University of Alagoas, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil. marcio_efe@yahoo.com.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7865-8345

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of contaminated and fragmented habitat puts the most sensitive species at risk and can function as an ecological trap. Therefore, it is expected that forest birds that inhabit fragments surrounded by agricultural activities present some level of contamination by non-essential metals. Thus, this work sought to identify, using feathers, whether wild understory birds are contaminated by aluminum from sugarcane crops and agricultural. Thus, this work assessed body condition and sought to identify, using feathers, whether wild understory birds are contaminated by aluminum in forest fragments surrounded from sugarcane crops and agricultural pastures. The study was carried out, between September 2021 and October 2022, in three fragments of Atlantic Forest protected, in Alagoas, Brazil. For analysis, 10 breast feathers of 35 individuals, belonging to 15 species were collected and grouped by date and location. The samples were macerated, lyophilized, weighed, stored in a desiccator, and digested in a microwave oven, and analyzed using Optical Emission Spectrometry and inductively coupled plasma, to determine the concentrations of aluminum. The presence of aluminum was detected in all samples (57, 92—552, 62 mg/kg). There is no consensus on the exact universal cutoff value for aluminum contamination in feathers. However, values above 200 mg/kg are not considered normal. Furthermore, the results showed the need to pay attention in the protected areas studied, which may be functioning as ecological traps, bringing harm to the reproductive success of several species, especially endemic and threatened ones, which tend to have their populations already reduced for other reasons.

Indexed as

AluminumBirdsEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsAnimalsBrazilFeathersForestsAluminumEnvironmental PollutantsContaminantsEndemic birdsHeavy metalsPernambuco Center of EndemismThreatened birds

Identifiers

PMID41995745
PMCPMC13090288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.