ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Features of low-dose CT-detected lung nodules: individuals who never smoked vs. who smoke(d) in a Chinese general population.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate and compare low-dose CT (LDCT)-defined pulmonary nodule features between individuals who never smoked and who smoke(d) in a Chinese general population. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study included 2033 participants from the Nelcin-B3 cohort who underwent baseline LDCT. Trained radiologists reviewed each CT scan and assessed nodule CT features, including nodule density, size, location, shape, edge, attachment type, calcification and perifissural nodules (PFNs). Multilevel logistic regression (adjusted for age and sex) was performed to evaluate the relationship between nodule CT features and smoking status, accounting for nodule clustering within participants.
resultsOverall, 36.7% (746/2033) of participants had at least one ≥ 30.0 mm
conclusionIn the Chinese general population, smoking status was associated with lung nodule prevalence and nodule number, but not with key nodule CT features. These findings suggest that in Asian populations, nodule characteristics may be influenced by factors beyond smoking, underscoring the need for population-specific risk stratification strategies in lung nodule assessment. KEY POINTS: Question Lung nodule risk stratification relies on their CT features, yet no Asian studies have comprehensively examined these features between individuals who never smoked and who smoke(d). Findings CT features of lung nodules (e.g., size, location, morphology) showed no significant differences between smoking groups in a Chinese general population, despite observed differences in nodule prevalence and count. Clinical relevance Relying solely on smoking history may underestimate the malignancy risk of lung nodules in Asian populations, emphasizing the need for population-specific risk stratification strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.